December 19, 2015
September 23, 2015
When wireless charging was introduced back when Google released NEXUS 4, I wasn't really sure if it would stick around. Very few manufacture support it (Nokia had it, Samsung supported it but required customers to upgrade their battery cover on their own dime). I invested in a couple of chargers but they were generally expensive ($30-50 range). Personally, I find it to be extremely convenient and having a charger at home and work makes sure my phone is always charged because I simply set it down on the charge pad when not in
I have recently taken notice on the increased awareness and availability in Qi Wireless Charging. Could it be that this format of charging is going strong? Take a look for your self:
1. Regular Qi-Charging device can be had for less than $15 these days, take a look on Amazon or other stores
3. IKEA announced a series of their furnitures and lamps supporting the Qi Wireless Charging standards. Thats huge support in the Qi Wireless standard as they are now integrated to their affordable furniture for the masses.
4. More new or random appliances are now integrating Qi Charging. I stumbled across two in the past 48 hours which is what prompted me to write this entry. Take a look at this pretty cool looking OLED desk lamp called AERELIGHT with Qi Charger as well as a JBL speaker system with built in NFC and Qi charging.
August 13, 2015
I just watched a news segment on CNBC titled "Smartphone for Offline Use" which talks about the current state of affairs for Cubans and smartphone usage. Report states that they are buying slightly older smartphones like the Galaxy S4 for $360; due to the lack of wireless internet coverage and it comes with:
- Pre-loaded World Wide Map
- Pre-loded Wikipedia Content
- (I am guessing its off contract)
My conclusion: Cubans are actually ahead of us in terms of practical smartphone experience!
While I understand having reliable 3G/4G connection is a privilege, I can't tell you how much I resent the movement from Google or Apple to force us to be depend on said internet connection. If you have ever caught yourself in a position where your phone is rendered useless because there is no connection (ie. rural, woods, camp sites, airplane), you'll know what I mean!
Smartphones should be able to operate without internet connection; otherwise its just a dumb phone.
July 1, 2015
May 11, 2015
The question extends beyond Apple Watch; I've raised this question against all smart watches for the past couple of years. The novelty of having a watch that can provide relevant information with a flick of a wrist is interesting. In an information driven age, those who can get the latest information fastest will often get the advantage. But is the smart watch providing the information fast enough (or convenient enough?)
While I still can't answer that just yet, I am most certain that at its infancy, its certainly is not easy enough.
1. Smart Watches are Phone Dependent (at least to make it useful): Until I can walk out of my house with a smart watch only and still make/receive calls, send/receive emails and texts and take a picture without tethering to a smartphone, this is just another device for me to carry along.
2. Smart Watches require charging daily (or maybe even twice daily); Under light usage, you might be able to get away with charging it over night and use it until the evening; if you play with it more often, you will likely need to take it off to recharge during the day and there lies the irony as you would be without your smart watch during some part of your day removing any incentive you've attributed to having this watch.
I can't live without a smartphone; I use it to call, email, text, work, fetch data/files and entertain. Oh, and I also use it as a watch as well as an alarm. Since I have to carry this with me at all times, I can't seem to justify the need of an Apple Watch.
January 23, 2015
Ever since I optimized my battery settings for the NEXUS 6, it can last long enough where I only charge it every other night (skipping a day). I realized even then, most of the time, the phone would still have almost 50% of battery left by the second night. So I've decided to see if I can make it last one more day. The result is: YES! By the 3rd evening at around 10PM, it had 7% juice. That same night, I was actually out with friends. I chose not to put the phone in battery saving mode, at around midnight, the phone finally ran out of juice.
Needless to say, I am quite impressed with the result. It seems like either Lollipop is really optimized for Nexus 6, or my coverage with AT&T has improved where the phone is not wasting battery trying to connect to the network all the time.
I do remember when I first received my NEXUS 5, I was impressed with the battery optimization (62% of power left after a full day of use); but few months later, things got weird and battery behavior became erratic (perhaps after an android update). I am hoping the NEXUS 6's performance will hod up longer.
January 17, 2015
So, each time I upgrade to the new Nexus devices, I always offer some tips to optimize battery life. Historically, Google always choose to run lean on the battery size; but for Nexus 6, they beefed it up to 3,220mAh which is big but IMHO should have been even larger. That said, the tips I am about to give might not be necessary, but in my usage test, I was surprised a single charge lasted two days of use for me (well, almost two days). At the time of writing, my phone has been off a charger since Friday morning around 7AM. It is Saturaday evening at 9PM (approx. 38 hrs later) and I still have 27% of battery life left... pretty cool!
So for what its worth, here is how I am optimizing for battery life:
1. Brightness Level: Approximately 10% of the brightness
2. Adaptive Brightness: OFF
3. Ambient Display: OFF
4. Sleep after 30 Seconds of Inactivity
5. Bluetooth Off
6. NFC Off
7. Preferred Network: 3G (HSPA+)
8. Turn WiFi on at home and at work
Note that, if I need these features, I will turn them on or turn them up as needed. I have noticed that battery life is impacted big time depending on the way the OS is setup, so I hope future updates doesn't mess things up for the NEXUS 6.
What Printer Did I get? Brother MFC-L2700DW
Why did I choose this model? Because it met my criteria, see below:
Criteria 1: Must be a laser printer, I am tired of ink jets drying on me when I need to use it at home.
Criteria 2: Must have a scanner WITH a document feeder (so I can scan a pile of paper at once)
Criteria 3: Must have Wireless (and Wired) Networking, the placement of my printer requires WiFi
Criteria 4: Must be a dark colored printer (I hate white printers turning yellow over time)
Criteria 5: Must be in the $100 range (this one is actually $129 at time of writing, reg. $180)
Criteria 6: Must be not too big: its for home, so I don't want a ginormous tower in my room
Criteria 7: Have the ability to scan or print from the cloud (Google Drive, DropBox, EverNote, etc.) ***This is where things got hazy. According to Brother's website, this printer was listed under one of the ones that support their cloud service dubbed as Brother Web Connect. (See picture evidence below taken at time of writing). This is also the reason why I decided to write this post to help you setup your Brother and not get frustrated. Earlier this morning, I finally heard back from Brother's tech support via email that they admit it was mistakenly labeled and this printer doesn't support Web Connect (I think only the fancier models with color LCDs have built in firmware to access Web Connect).
Lets get started, this will be the easiest setup guide to follow, 3 steps and you will be on your way to true bliss (and not having to spend 6 hours figuring it out):
1. Get printer on your network (Do this from the printer):
a. Wired (it should be a breezy, plug in the RJ45 cable from router)
b. Wireless WiFi (From printer menu go to: Menu>>6.Network>>2.WLAN>>3.
SETUP WIZARD>>SSID>>WEP/WAP KEY)
2. PC or Mac Users: You can download the Brother Driver and Software so you can connect your computer to printer. Again two options:
a. You can get the driver only package for basic function or...3. If you have an Android or iOS device: Please do your self a favor and download the Brother iPrint & Scan app (assuming the model of your Brother printer supports this feature).
b. You can get the driver + software support so you can do fancier stuff...
I think driver package is enough... because the gravy is actually in the 3rd Step...
In short, this app basically turns your phone or tablet into the missing "color LCD" or the Web Connect Software from this printer. Its surprisingly easy to use and you can basically use it to operate the printer to Scan or Print to and from the popular cloud storage services. The app itself can be linked to the various cloud services so you can print from the cloud, etc.. Just make sure both the printer and your device is on the SAME SSID or network.4. Final Tip: From any device (laptop, tablet, or phone), as long as you are on the same network, you can configure the printer's setting via a browser; just have to find out what internal IP address your router has assigned it to be, ie. http://192.168.1.5. Once in, it gives a word of options to configure.
I am very pleased with this printer once I figured the last two tips. I just wished the manufacturer's quick installation guide would have been written clearer to save me a few hours. Well, here it is folks, I am transferring my hours of research for you. Enjoy!
Brother Web Connect Solution for MFC-L2000DW Laser Printer
January 7, 2015
For starters, the "Turbo Charger" plug is in fact different, it is capable of sending more power than the standard 5V usb chargers. According to this article, (and from what I can see from the text on the photos taken), the turbo charger has three levels of voltage outputs (other charger models may vary):
5V@1.6A(8W)Now, I do not have any electrical background so please do not hold me to it, but my understanding is that the higher the voltage, the higher the "force" or "pressure" (think of a bigger pipe) electricity is being delivered); hence the ability to quickly replenish power to a drained battery.
All of this is based on a rebranded Qualcomm technology known as Quick Charge 2.0; which intelligently selects the voltage depending on how empty your battery is. Somewhere I read in the comments that they do this to avoid over-heating the battery if you give it a constant high voltage charge. Below, you'll find some reference by Qualcomm talking about this technology. The really good news is that it seems like there are already devices supporting Quick Charge 2.0, but I think Google/Motorola is the one that really marketed in a big way (atleast enough for me to take notice).
Link 1 (Quick Charge 2.0 has arrived)
Link 2 (Quick Charge Partial Supported Device List)
Some of the devices currently supporting Quick Charge 2.0 are:
* HTC One M8
* Sony Xperia Z3
* Moto Droid Turbo
* Samsung Galaxy Note 4
* Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet
October 29, 2014
Wow, the drama and development of this mobile payment story is getting more interesting by the day. At first, CVS and Rite Aid was the social media punching bag (take a look at their respective Facebook pages, every comment there is extremely negative threatening to take their business elsewhere). Engadget just reported from a different perspective which is that the contract MCX members signed prevents them from using rival technologies...
For those unfamiliar with MCX, its known as "Merchant Customer Exchange", their end product is known as CurrentC, which is a payment method designed to avoid credit card (or it's fees) by asking customers to link this payment type directly to their bank account. In the end, retailers gets to save 2 to 3% from their credit card sales which, frankly speaking, can be quite significant. They just need to figure a way out to "spin it" so customers feel like there is a big benefit.
While this technology is not yet to be rolled out, Apple Pay's launch must have tossed a major monkey wrench catching them off guard. Keep in mind that Google Wallet has been trying to push for mobile NFC payment for a couple of years now and they've had minimal success. Apple Pay is suddenly making everyone jump on the band wagon; I can certainly see why the folks at MCX decide to wave it's contractual terms at its members in a holding pattern or as Tim Cook puts it, its a "skirmish".
Here is the point of view I am taking from a consumer mobile experience stand point:
No. 1 - As a consumer, I do not give a shit about the 2% or 3% credit card fee retailers gripe about
No. 2 - As a savvy consumer, I enjoy the benefits of using my credit card as a). a layer to protect me and b). get some type of incentive back to me such as mileages, points, cashback, etc..
No. 3 - Do not take away choices or options; I love having options, the more the better; consumers work hard for their money, respect them enough to give them all the methods for payment
No. 4 - Retailers doesn't get consumers or mobile technology; here is a clear example of MCX retailers under estimate the power and reach of Apple and it's fan boys (aka consumers), still thinks it can engineer something to change customers minds...
I am curious to see how this story will develope and will the power of consumers get Apple Pay or Google Wallet back in their store.
October 17, 2014
I haven’t been very active lately on this blog, especially by way of opinion pieces. But after the recent iPhone 6 and Nexus 6 announcements, I felt like the smartphone space has taken a drastic turn, enough to write or complain about it. So here we go.
The physical size increase of smartphones are obvious; if I were to blame or credit the one company that started it all then it would be Samsung when it launched the “Galaxy Note” smartphone. Right around that time, a slew of smartphones hits the scene with screen sizes larger than 4” (LG Optimus, Sony Xperia Z Ultra, Google Nexus Galaxy-4-5, LG G2, Samsung S4, S5, Moto X, Droid Razr just to name a few).
This Sh!t just got real
As mentioned earlier, the real shocker for me is when the two iconic giants Apple and Google both released their flagship phones with larger than life screen size without having any other choice for smaller options. (I know iPhone 5s and Nexus 5 might stick around for a bit, but by definition, they are no longer flagship phones, see related post from Engadget). This, for me, is marking for the end of an era… going forward, if you want flagship devices, you better carry a purse, messenger bag or at-least wear cargo pants so you can carry the phone with you.
When Technology gets Silly
The irony here is that I’ve always believed technology is suppose to enhance our life. Thinner/lighter laptops, flat screen TVs, cars with more power and mpg, etc. While Smartphones have drastically improved our lifestyle, but going beyond 4” seems like we’ve peaked out and the larger sizes now start to create a problem. Aside from not fitting in our pockets comfortably thus starting new etiquette discussion such as this one, the physics of leverage can easily stir up more potential for the “bending” iPhone 6+ if you did manage to squeeze these larger phones to your back pocket.